Sponsored by Tax Analysts tax.com Home Page tax.com: The Tax Daily for the Citizen Taxpayer

Tax Gifts: Market Place

LexisNexis Tax Law Center


Alabama is Number 1 (or No. 50 depending on your view)

David Brunori | Nov. 3, 2009 07:08 AM EST

The U.S. Census numbers for 2007 just came out and Alabama has the lowest per capita state and local tax burden in the nation. Some Alabama politicians are crowing about that. After all, Alabama citizens pay only $2,909 a year in combined state and local taxes. That compares to $6,898 in New York, $6,044 in Connecticut, and $5,944 in New Jersey. Alaska and Wyoming also have high per capita tax burdens, but those states collect mostly severance taxes that are not paid by in-state residents. The fifty state median is $4,011. The other states with low tax burdens are Mississippi ($2,989), Tennessee ($3,005), South Dakota ($3,009), and South Carolina ($3,134).

What does it all mean? In a vacuum, it means nothing. The states with the lowest per capita tax burdens inevitably have the lowest per capita spending on public services. While people don't like to pay taxes, they do like to have bridges that don't fall down and someone on the receiving end of 911 calls. Still there is a marked difference in the level of taxes and government in New York and Alabama. If residents of Manhattan are unhappy with that mix, there is always Birmingham.

Comments (1)

The AP story David links to leads with two contradictory sentences. First:

A new study from the U.S. Census Bureau shows Alabama residents and companies
paid less in state and local taxes than their counterparts in any other state.
[which is wrong]

and then:

In the 2007 fiscal year, the average state and local taxes collected per person
in Alabama were $2,909. [which is correct]

Census is reporting collections, which include substantial payments by
non-residents. So while Alabama's governments collect the least, Alabama's
residents don't pay the least. That blue ribbon goes to Alaskans who pay much
less in state-local taxes per capita than any other state's residents. Luckily
for Alaskans, their government does a great job of raking in revenue from
non-residents so that their coffers are full. For more info on a better
calculation of residents' "tax burdens" and how those differ from collections,
see the Tax Foundation's annual estimates at
www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/335.html

Posted by Bill Ahern on Nov. 4, 2009 at 11:24 AM


Comment


Trackbacks (0)

Posted by JobFairNews on Nov. 7, 2009 at 10:44 PM

Posted by Tax Law Center on Feb. 5, 2010 at 06:34 AM


Trackback

Permalink | Comment | Trackback | Share | Other Posts by David Brunori

All views expressed on these blogs are those of their individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Tax Analysts. Further, Tax Analysts makes no representation concerning the views expressed and does not guarantee the source, originality, accuracy, completeness or reliability of any statement, fact, information, data, finding, interpretation, or opinion presented. Tax Analysts particularly makes no representation concerning anything found on external links connected to this site.

 

Newsstand


Media Sources

White House: Obama Urges Support for Small Business

Tax Expenditures: Are They Worth the Cost?

As Certain as Death -- Quotations About Taxes

Tax Literacy Project